Talbot West / Enterprise data architectureTelecommunications

Enterprise data unification across acquired businesses

A multinational telecommunications company had expanded through repeated acquisitions and was operating across more than a dozen ERP environments.

Leadership lacked a reliable consolidated view because business units used different schemas, terminology, reporting structures, operating definitions, and local practices.

Enterprise data architectureSemantic mappingStakeholder alignmentData governanceERP integrationPredictive analytics
Decision and implementation sequence
  1. 01Acquisition-driven fragmentation
  2. 02Operating and semantic mapping
  3. 03Stakeholder alignment
  4. 04Shared definitions
  5. 05Canonical architecture
  6. 06Automated reconciliation
  7. 07Decision capability
01Enterprise mapping

Map how each business represented the enterprise

The work examined how acquired businesses represented customers, products, revenue, costs, organizational units, operating activity, and other core entities.

Reporting had depended on extensive manual reconciliation because similar concepts were stored and interpreted differently across the organization.

The mapping surfaced
Equivalent concepts represented differently
Conflicting definitions
Duplicated information
Inconsistent reporting logic
Data-quality failures
Local distinctions with operating value
02Alignment and standardization

Establish shared definitions

A canonical enterprise data structure required explicit choices about meaning, authority, preservation, and reconciliation.

The enterprise needed common definitions where comparison and consolidation depended on them while preserving local distinctions that still carried operating value.

01Definition equivalence
02Material differences
03Source authority
04Enterprise standards
05Local preservation
06Reconciliation rules
07Exception handling
08Confidence thresholds

These decisions required alignment across business units, technical teams, operating leaders, and enterprise stakeholders.

Shared reporting depended on shared meaning, explicit decision rights, standardization rules, and governance.

03Canonical architecture

Encode the agreed rules into the data architecture

A canonical data structure normalized overlapping and conflicting schemas while retaining the detail individual business units still required.

Automated pipelines extracted, validated, transformed, reconciled, and standardized information from the legacy ERP environments.

More than a dozen ERP environments
Local schemasLocal definitionsLocal reporting logic
ValidationTransformationReconciliationException handling
Canonical enterprise modelShared definitions with preserved operating detail

Anomalies were surfaced for review rather than silently carried downstream.

The resulting infrastructure established repeatable rules for moving information from local systems into the shared enterprise environment.

04Decision capability

Create one operating view for the combined enterprise

Leadership gained a common operating view across business units, geographies, and product lines.

Information that had required weeks or months to assemble became continuously available.

Operational result13% reduction in operational overhead

Redundant reporting, manual reconciliation, and duplicative data-management work were reduced while leadership gained a real-time enterprise view.

Alignment → definition → architecture → implementation → decision capability

Acquisition-driven fragmentationOperating and semantic mappingStakeholder alignmentShared definitionsCanonical architectureAutomated reconciliationDecision capability
Tell us your situation →