AI Insights
What is reinforcement learning in CHAI?
Art deco stylized tree with geometric, angular branches forming symmetrical patterns. Circuit traces run through branches, carrying glowing data particles. High-performing branches transform from copper to brilliant gold and grow thicker, while underperforming branches dim and narrow. Seasons transition in quadrants around the tree, showing the evolution of optimization. Classic zigzag and geometric motifs decorate the base. Background features stepped layers of circuitry in muted tones, allowing the tree's optimization process to stand out in brilliant metallic colors.

What is reinforcement learning in CHAI?

By Jacob Andra / Published February 27, 2025 
Last Updated: February 27, 2025

Executive summary:

Reinforcement learning (RL) lets systems learn and adapt through dynamic interaction with environments and challenges. By using cumulative rewards, RL drives recursive improvement toward a stated goal.

This approach enables self-improving AI implementations that:

  • Refine strategies based on actual business outcomes.
  • Adapt to changing conditions without manual retraining.
  • Optimize resource allocation across competing priorities.
  • Maintain transparency through chain-of-thought reasoning.

Chain-of-thought reasoning makes black-box RL more explainable and effective. It enables CHAI systems to make effective decisions and document their reasoning at each step.

Talbot West incorporates reinforcement learning and chain-of-thought reasoning into our CHAI ensembles, where multiple AI agents collaborate to solve high-stakes problems. CHAI systems refine strategies through interaction with real-world conditions for better solutions that evolve with business needs.

From predictive analytics to operational optimization, RL in CHAI delivers measurable value and sustained performance improvements.

BOOK YOUR FREE CONSULTATION
Main takeaways
Reinforcement learning helps AI systems adapt through feedback and interaction.
CHAI's modular structure enables targeted reinforcement learning at different levels.
Economics-inspired frameworks create competition and optimization among AI modules.
Chain-of-thought reasoning makes reinforcement-learning decisions explainable.
Organizations can implement this approach incrementally to manage risk.

What is reinforcement learning?

Reinforcement learning (RL) is a branch of machine learning focused on decision-making. RL trains an agent to interact with an environment by choosing actions that maximize cumulative rewards.

Simulated environments provide the controlled conditions required for agents to develop strategies and explore optimal actions without external risks. This learning process lets the agent adapt and improve without relying on explicit instructions or labeled data.

Unlike supervised and unsupervised learning, where models learn from examples with clear outputs, RL requires the agent to discover optimal strategies through exploration. It is particularly effective in scenarios where the solution is not immediately apparent or where outcomes depend on sequences of decisions.

 RL components

RL systems are built around several elements:

  • AI agent: the decision-making entity. The agent selects actions and adapts its behavior based on the outcomes.
  • Environment: the external system where the agent operates. It reacts to the agent’s actions and determines the next state and the reward.
  • States: representations of situations or conditions within the environment. The state provides context for the agent’s decisions.
  • Actions: the choices available to the agent. Each action has consequences that affect the state and the reward.
  • Rewards: numerical values assigned to actions. Rewards indicate the success or failure of the agent’s behavior and guide future decisions.
  • Policy: the rules or strategies the agent uses to choose its actions. A well-trained policy helps the agent achieve its long-term objectives.

The agent learns through a feedback loop. It takes an action, observes the resulting state, and adjusts its behavior based on the reward or penalty it receives. Over time, this feedback refines the policy, so the agent can make better decisions and achieve long-term goals.

Reinforcement learning algorithms

RL strategies are highly developed and train agents using multiple techniques. The most popular reinforcement learning algorithms are:

  • Q-learning: A value-based algorithm that learns the optimal action-value function to maximize long-term rewards without requiring a model of the environment.
  • Policy gradient method: Directly optimize the policy by adjusting weights to maximize expected rewards, often used in continuous action spaces.
  • Monte Carlo method: These methods use episode-specific returns to estimate values for scenarios where episodes naturally terminate.
  • Temporal difference learning: It combines ideas from Monte Carlo and dynamic programming to update value estimates after each step rather than waiting for the end of an episode.
  • SVM algorithm: It applies support vector machines to classify state-action pairs or estimate value functions within reinforcement learning frameworks.
  • Deep Q-networks: They are extended Q-learning using deep neural networks to approximate action-value functions, enabling RL in high-dimensional state spaces such as image-based environments.

These algorithms have been used to achieve state-of-the-art results in applications such as game-playing, robotics, and decision-making. These algorithms are continuously evolving and being improved upon.

From single-agent to multi-agent systems in CHAI

Old RL uses a single agent in a defined environment. Enterprise challenges demand more. Complex business operations involve interconnected processes and competing priorities that single-agent systems can't handle.

Cognitive Hive AI (CHAI) implementations extend RL to multi-agent frameworks where specialized AI modules function as independent agents within a coordinated system. This modular approach, inspired by beehive intelligence, enables more sophisticated problem-solving while maintaining reinforcement learning.

How reinforcement learning empowers CHAI

Art deco hexagonal beehive structure with geometric honeycomb patterns. Stylized metallic bees with circuit board wings and LED abdomens in varied colors. Golden data streams flow along successful paths, becoming brighter and wider while unsuccessful paths fade to dim blue. Crisp angular lines and symmetrical patterns reminiscent of 1920s design. Background features dark tech-noir atmosphere with binary code waterfalls. The queen bee has a central processing unit visible through a transparent gold and black exoskeleton with data cables connecting to worker bees. Grays and golds for the main colors, with blue accents.

CHAI's modular, system-of-systems architecture facilitates RL. Unlike monolithic AI models, CHAI breaks complex capabilities into specialized modules coordinated by a central system—similar to how a beehive coordinates specialized workers for collective success.

This modularity enables reinforcement learning to be applied at multiple levels. A multi-layered RL approach results in AI systems that improve across different operational scales—from individual specialized tasks to overall system effectiveness.

Module-level reinforcement learning

Individual specialized modules within a CHAI implementation can incorporate reinforcement learning to optimize their specific functions:

  • Document processing modules learn from user corrections.
  • Forecasting modules adjust based on prediction accuracy.
  • Recommendation engines refine suggestions based on user responses.
  • Security modules adapt to emerging threat patterns.
  • Translation models improve language quality based on user feedback.
  • Image recognition modules refine classification accuracy through verified results.
  • Anomaly detection systems adjust sensitivity based on false positive/negative rates.
  • Resource allocation modules optimize scheduling based on utilization outcomes.
  • Process automation modules learn optimal execution sequences through performance metrics.
  • Data extraction modules improve parsing accuracy through validation feedback.

Coordination-level reinforcement learning

The "queen bee" coordination layer in CHAI can use reinforcement learning to optimize how it orchestrates specialized modules:

  • Determining which modules to activate for specific tasks
  • Allocating computational resources efficiently
  • Balancing speed and accuracy tradeoffs
  • Adapting routing paths based on module performance

System-level reinforcement learning

The CHAI ensemble can apply RL to higher-level optimization objectives:

  • Minimizing resource utilization while maintaining performance
  • Adapting to changing user preferences and workflows
  • Balancing competing business objectives
  • Optimizing for long-term value rather than immediate outcomes

The economic model of CHAI reinforcement learning

CHAI's reinforcement learning architecture can be structured using a decentralized economic model that mirrors successful business operations. This approach treats AI components like divisions in a conglomerate corporation, each responsible for specific functions, resource allocations (budgets), performance incentives and penalties, and competition and collaboration mechanisms.

This economic model parallels free market dynamics through:

  • Decentralized decision-making across specialized modules.
  • Resource allocation based on performance rather than central planning.
  • Emergent optimization through competition and selection pressure.
  • Self-improving system architecture through natural component selection.

The result is an AI system that becomes increasingly effective over time, discovering optimal strategies that might not have been apparent to human designers.

Multi-component competition

Multiple AI modules (LLMs, machine learning models, and other specialized components) can attempt the same task independently. This creates a competitive dynamic where the best solutions emerge naturally, rather than being predetermined.

Adjudication mechanism

Dedicated evaluation components assess the quality of each solution based on predefined metrics aligned with business objectives. This provides clear feedback that drives the reinforcement learning process.

Dynamic resource allocation

High-performing components receive increased computational resources, priority in decision-making, or other rewards. The most effective approaches receive the resources they need to maximize impact.

Performance-based optimization

Underperforming components see reduced resource allocation or replacement with better alternatives. This creates constant pressure for improvement and adaptation.

Chain of thought reasoning in reinforcement learning

Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning breaks down complex problem-solving into explicit, intermediate steps that connect the initial question to the conclusion. Rather than jumping directly to an answer, a system using chain-of-thought reasoning to:

  1. Divide complex problems into manageable sub-problems.
  2. Document each reasoning step with explicit logic.
  3. Maintain working memory of intermediate results.
  4. Build subsequent reasoning on earlier conclusions.
  5. Create a traceable path from premises to final decisions.

This approach makes the "thinking process" of an AI system visible and inspectable. It also is far more effective than “single-shot” approaches that attempt to tackle a complex problem in one go.

The dual benefits of chain of thought in reinforcement learning

When integrated with reinforcement learning in CHAI architectures, chain-of-thought reasoning delivers two complementary benefits.

Labyrinthine structure with art deco geometric patterns and symmetrical design. Maze walls constructed from dark metallic materials with embedded circuit traces. A digital entity (represented as a glowing geometric shape) leaves trails of light—successful paths crystallize into bright gold data streams while failed attempts fade to dull copper. Maze subtly reconfigures itself, with wall segments that shift position. Classic art deco chevrons and stepped forms decorate the architecture. Overhead perspective reveals the entire optimization process occurring within a stylized mechanical brain.

1. Chain of thought is more transparent

Chain of thought reasoning creates transparency in reinforcement learning by:

  • Revealing value assessments: shows exactly how the RL system evaluates different states and potential actions.
  • Clarifying reward attribution: demonstrates how the system connects specific actions to resulting rewards.
  • Documenting policy evolution: makes explicit how the system's decision strategy develops through interaction and feedback.
  • Visualizing multi-step planning: illustrates how the system reasons about sequences of actions to achieve long-term objectives.

This explainability evolves reinforcement learning from a mysterious "trial and error" process into an inspectable reasoning system that can justify its decisions at each step.

For example, rather than a supply chain optimization system opaquely recommending "Reduce inventory of component X by 30%" with no rationale provided, it can provide its complete reasoning chain:

"Historical demand for component X shows 20% seasonal decline in Q3 (confidence: 87%). Current inventory levels would last 4.7 months at projected usage rates. Carrying costs for this component are $2,340 per month. Reducing inventory by 30% would maintain 3.3 months of safety stock while reducing carrying costs by $702 monthly. Three alternative suppliers can deliver within 14 days if needed, making this reduction low-risk."

This transparency enables verification of the system's reasoning, identification of potential gaps or errors in logic, clear documentation for compliance and audit purposes, and trust-building with stakeholders who need to understand AI decisions.

2. Chain of thought is more effective

Chain of thought reasoning improves reinforcement learning's effectiveness in solving complex problems:

  • Breaks through optimization barriers with systematic exploration: Traditional RL algorithms converge on suboptimal solutions in complex state spaces. A CoT RL system documents which strategies it has evaluated, identifies unexplored approaches, and tests alternatives without redundancy—discovering solutions that statistical approaches miss.
  • Accelerates cross-domain pattern recognition: CoT captures reasoning patterns, not just statistical correlations. CHAI systems identify when logical structures from one domain apply to another. A fraud detection system that masters temporal reasoning patterns applies the same logic to supply chain anomaly detection without extensive retraining.
  • Enables precise multi-stage optimization: Business processes involve interconnected decision points where choices in one area constrain options elsewhere. For example, a manufacturing CHAI system tracks how production scheduling affects maintenance windows, inventory requirements, and delivery timelines—optimizing across constraints that systems treating each decision in isolation cannot address.
  • Focuses human expertise at critical decision points: Domain experts examining reasoning chains provide targeted input where it matters most. Experts correct specific faulty assumptions rather than rejecting entire recommendations.
  • Pinpoints error sources for systematic improvement: When outcomes fall short, CoT provides a traceable decision path. This enables the correction of a specific reasoning step rather than broad parameter adjustments that might introduce new problems.

Chain of thought in reinforcement learning: A defense logistics example

Consider a defense logistics scenario where a CHAI system is tasked with optimizing equipment maintenance and deployment schedules across multiple bases.

Without CoT reasoning, the system might produce seemingly arbitrary recommendations that human operators can’t validate or which seem to be at odds with their operational knowledge.

With CoT reasoning, the system breaks down this complex challenge:

  • Problem decomposition: The system identifies equipment maintenance requirements, mission schedules, personnel availability, supply chain constraints, weather forecasts, and other interconnected factors.
  • Dependency mapping: The system articulates how these factors influence each other. For example, how maintenance schedules affect equipment availability, which impacts mission readiness.
  • Sequential planning: The system develops staged plans with clear dependencies: maintenance activities must precede deployment windows, which must align with personnel availability.
  • Constraint resolution: The system identifies and resolves conflicts: when maintenance and mission needs conflict, it explores alternative scheduling or resource allocation.
  • Optimization with explanation: When recommending schedule changes, the system provides its complete reasoning chain, including the factors considered, alternatives explored, and expected outcomes.

A CoT approach makes the system's recommendations transparent and enables it to tackle more complex, multi-faceted optimization challenges than wouldn’t be possible with a single-shot approach.

The recursive improvement cycle

When CoT reasoning and RL work together in CHAI architectures, they create a powerful recursive improvement cycle:

  1. The RL components identify potentially effective strategies based on interaction and feedback.
  2. The CoT components articulate these strategies in a structured, explicit format that humans can understand.
  3. Human experts review the reasoning chains and provide targeted feedback on specific steps or assumptions.
  4. The reinforcement learning components incorporate this precise feedback to refine their underlying models.
  5. The improved models generate more effective strategies, continuing the cycle.

This human-in-the-loop approach combines the adaptive power of reinforcement learning with human expertise and oversight, creating systems that continuously improve while remaining aligned with organizational objectives and values.

Balancing exploration and exploitation

One of reinforcement learning's key challenges is balancing exploration (trying new approaches to discover better strategies) with exploitation (using known effective strategies).

Exploration considerations:

  • Discovering novel optimization strategies
  • Adapting to changing conditions
  • Avoiding stagnation in local optimums
  • Learning from edge cases

Exploitation considerations:

  • Minimizing operational risks
  • Maintaining performance
  • Meeting immediate business needs
  • Maintaining user trust

CHAI's modular architecture enables organizations to control the exploration-exploitation balance through the following:

  1. Sandbox environments: Test new strategies in isolated modules before deployment.
  2. A/B deployment: Run exploratory and conservative strategies in parallel to compare outcomes.
  3. Risk-weighted exploration: Adjust exploration rates based on the potential business impact of errors.
  4. Human-in-the-loop oversight: Enable subject matter experts to validate strategy shifts.

This thoughtful approach to the exploration-exploitation tradeoff allows organizations to benefit from reinforcement learning's adaptive power while managing associated risks.

The history of reinforcement learning

In the book "Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction," RL developed from two main research paths that converged. The first path started in psychology with studies of animal learning. The second focused on optimal control mathematics.

Edward Thorndike established a foundation in 1911 through his Law of Effect, showing how positive outcomes strengthen behavior patterns while negative outcomes weaken them. Here we see the link between actions and their consequences that defines reinforcement learning.

In the 1950s, Richard Bellman created dynamic programming and formalized Markov decision processes. These mathematical tools provided ways to solve control problems through iterative value calculations. Around the same time, Marvin Minsky explored computational models of reinforcement learning using analog neural networks called SNARCs.

John Andreae built an early interactive learning system called STeLLA in 1963. Donald Michie followed with MENACE in 1961–1963, which learned to play tic-tac-toe through reward signals. Michie went on to develop BOXES for the more complex task of pole balancing without prior knowledge.

A breakthrough came in 1989 when Chris Watkins developed Q-learning, which united optimal control mathematics with trial-and-error learning principles. Tesauro demonstrated the power of these techniques in 1992 when his TD-Gammon program reached master-level play at Backgammon through self-play.

The field expanded as researchers applied these methods to increasingly difficult problems in robotics, game-playing, and industrial control. Each advance is built on the core idea that systems can learn optimal behavior through interaction and feedback. The lineage of agents, from early models such as BOXES to today’s advanced neural networks, showcases the evolution of reinforcement learning.

Today, companies such as Talbot West push the frontiers of what reinforcement learning can accomplish with our CHAI ensembles and CoT approaches.

Examples of reinforcement learning in practice

Resource allocation in cloud systems

Reinforcement learning optimizes the distribution of computing resources across a range of tasks in cloud environments. Instead of following static configurations, RL systems adjust resources dynamically based on workload patterns, preventing bottlenecks and minimizing waste. The ability to respond to changes in a dynamic environment strengthens operational resilience and minimizes inefficiencies.

For instance, an RL-powered scheduler can allocate CPU power during demand spikes for stable application performance without overcommitting resources.

Trading strategies

Financial markets require fast, adaptive decision-making. Reinforcement learning creates algorithms capable of analyzing real-time data and adjusting investment strategies. These systems test different approaches, refine their understanding of market dynamics, and increase returns by reacting to new trends.

The systems rely on a policy method to provide adaptability and let traders adjust strategies based on evolving market conditions. Unlike rule-based models, RL approaches evolve alongside market fluctuations to maintain effectiveness in volatile environments.

Supply chain logistics

RL boosts supply chain management by addressing unpredictability. Algorithms in this field create actionable schedules, select optimal shipping routes, and determine precise inventory levels.

For example, a logistics firm can use RL to predict seasonal demand shifts. This approach places products at the right locations, prevents delays, and reduces surpluses.

Industrial process control

Reinforcement learning improves operational stability in industrial processes, such as manufacturing or energy production. These systems identify control strategies that stabilize operations and reduce inefficiencies.

A power plant, for instance, uses RL to adjust energy outputs in real time. This method prevents blackouts and improves overall efficiency.

Robotics and autonomous systems

Physical AI is a prime domain for reinforcement learning. Machines learn to perform intricate tasks such as assembling components in factories or navigating through unknown terrain.

Model-free RL is well used in this field, as it eliminates the need for predefined models so robots can operate in unpredictable conditions. Autonomous vehicles, guided by RL, improve driving policies by testing various scenarios for a safer and more reliable performance.

Reinforcement learning FAQ

Reinforcement learning solves problems that static algorithms cannot, particularly in systems that change or operate under uncertainty. It has proven effective in areas such as autonomous control and energy optimization, where adaptability is critical.

From robotics to financial trading, RL helps AI discover strategies through interaction and adapt to complex environments without relying on predefined rules.

Deep RL combines reinforcement learning with neural networks to solve complex problems. Neural networks process high-dimensional data, while reinforcement learning develops strategies through environmental interaction. This approach powers breakthroughs such as mastering video games, autonomous driving, and advanced robotics.

Artificial intelligence is the broader field of intelligent machine systems. Reinforcement learning is a specific type of machine learning. RL focuses on agents learning optimal behaviors through interaction with environments and receiving feedback via reward signals.

Yes, OpenAI uses reinforcement learning in several projects. Some of the examples are agents that learn to play complex games (e.g. Dota 2) and improve large language models through reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). These efforts refine decision-making and system performance.

Reinforcement learning will drive significant AI advancements. Its capacity to solve complex problems across industries—from robotics to financial strategies—positions it as a critical technology for developing intelligent, adaptive systems that respond dynamically to unpredictable environments.

RL is refining strategies through repeated trials and adapting to new environments. With underlying principles, such as optimizing policies and learning from feedback, RL can tackle complex, multi-step challenges across diverse domains, like robotics, finance, and healthcare.

Reinforcement learning equips artificial intelligence to address unpredictable scenarios through experience-driven learning so it can tackle challenges beyond the reach of fixed algorithms. Autonomous vehicles demonstrate this principle with extraordinary clarity: where traditional navigation systems collapse, these algorithms interpret intricate road conditions with nuanced precision.

These intelligent systems absorb insights from each encounter to improve their decision-making. Neural networks transform raw experience into sophisticated responses that precisely navigate environments. Other learning systems often struggle because of a lack of generalization, while RL adapts its strategies effectively to varied and unpredictable scenarios.

Instead of relying on large labeled datasets, RL systems discover optimal strategies by interacting with their environments. This exploratory nature makes RL a main technology for creative AI projects, where innovative solutions often emerge from iterative experimentation.

A robotic arm masters object manipulation through trial, revealing strategies no programmer could predict. This method is powerful in complex scenarios that defy rigid instructions. Neural networks transform raw experience into intelligent responses.

When paired with chain-of-thought reasoning, RL systems can prioritize strategies that generate maximum value across extended periods. This capability to evaluate decisions over time gives RL a significant advantage in scenarios requiring sustained optimization.

RL-powered neural networks calculate intricate trade-offs to create solutions that balance immediate requirements with broader performance metrics. As a result, we get intelligent systems that think beyond single-step reactions.

Reinforcement learning excels at sequential decision-making where each choice affects future options and outcomes. The system builds an understanding of decision dependencies through experience and feedback.

In CHAI implementations, this capability is enhanced through chain of thought (CoT) reasoning. Rather than making decisions based on opaque statistical correlations, the system explicitly documents its reasoning process. It:

  1. Maps the entire decision space with clear dependencies between steps.
  2. Documents preconditions and consequences for each decision point.
  3. Maintains awareness of how early decisions constrain later options.
  4. Produces traceable reasoning chains showing exactly how it navigates complex tradeoffs.

For example, in healthcare, a CHAI system with CoT might reason: "Patient history shows an adverse reaction to medication A (confidence: 92%). Alternative medication B is effective for the primary condition but requires liver function monitoring. Current liver enzymes are within normal range. Recommended treatment plan: medication B with liver function tests at 2 and 6 weeks, with contingency plan C if enzymes elevate."

In financial trading, the system explicitly tracks dependencies: "Current position in Asset X creates exposure to interest rate fluctuations. Based on our model's confidence in rising rates (76%), recommend partial hedge using instruments Y and Z, maintaining 40% exposure to capture potential upside while mitigating 60% of downside risk."

This integration of reinforcement learning's optimization power with CoT reasoning transforms how AI handles complex dependencies—creating systems that navigate intricate decision landscapes while maintaining complete transparency about their decision process.

Resources

  • Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1988, January 15). Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. http://incompleteideas.net/book/ebook/the-book.html
  • White, D. J. (1993). A Survey of Applications of Markov Decision Processes. Department of Information Technology. https://www2.it.uu.se/edu/course/homepage/aism/st11/MDPApplications3.pdf
  • Andreae, J. H. (1963, June). STELLA: A Scheme for a Learning Machine. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/252919025_STELLA_A_scheme_for_a_learning_machine
  • Watkins, C. (1992, June). Technical Note Q-Learning. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF00992698.pdf
  • Kaufmann, T., Weng, P., Bengs, V., & Hüllermeier, E. (2023, December 22). A Survey of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.14925

About the author

Jacob Andra is the founder of Talbot West and a co-founder of The Institute for Cognitive Hive AI, a not-for-profit organization dedicated to promoting Cognitive Hive AI (CHAI) as a superior architecture to monolithic AI models. Jacob serves on the board of 47G, a Utah-based public-private aerospace and defense consortium. He spends his time pushing the limits of what AI can accomplish, especially in high-stakes use cases. Jacob also writes and publishes extensively on the intersection of AI, enterprise, economics, and policy, covering topics such as explainability, responsible AI, gray zone warfare, and more.
Jacob Andra

Industry insights

We stay up to speed in the world of AI so you don’t have to.
View All

Subscribe to our newsletter

Cutting-edge insights from in-the-trenches AI practicioners
Subscription Form

About us

Talbot West brings Fortune-500-level consulting and business process discovery to the mid-market. We then implement cutting-edge AI solutions for our clients. 

magnifiercrosschevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightarrow-right linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram